29 March 2006
Dear PAKISAMA Leaders, Members, Partners and Friends,
Last March 22, the Solidarity Committee (SOLCOM) conducted a joint consultation workshop of PAKISAMA leaders at the Institute of Social Order (ISO) in the Ateneo De Manila University. The result of the consultation would have been the basis for determining the direction of the planned PAKISAMA National Congress (general assembly of affiliates) - whether to dissolve PAKISAMA or unite and reorganize it.
As we have conveyed to you in an earlier communication, some individuals proposed that PAKISAMA as an organization should just be dissolved and its corporate existence terminated, claiming that there is no longer a basis for going on with the organization because the differences among the warring factions are beyond resolution and the best that could be done is for both groups to just go separate ways. To the uninitiated and uninformed this approach would seem to be the most practical and easiest way out.
But to those who have been with PAKISAMA for quite a while -- they who have spent a great deal of their time, talent and resources for the confederation and all the things that it stands for after all these years -- this proposal is a bit overboard. They know that the conflict in PAKISAMA is limited to a few personalities and that the existence of PAKISAMA as an organization should not be sacrificed for the inabilities of a few to come to terms and get along well with one another. PAKISAMA is much even larger than all these individuals and personalities combined that instead of it being sacrificed, it should be the other way around. The few who are in the vortex of the conflict should be made to step aside and give way to a new set of leaders to take over.
With all due respect to opinions on the contrary, this is the core of the position that the group of Ka Aning Loza and Ka Prot Naga, who has the support of a decisive majority of the PAKISAMA affiliates (17 out 28 peasant organizations), has taken in opposing the proposition to dissolve PAKISAMA. Their position supporting the conduct of a PAKISAMA Unity Congress was clearly expressed in a letter they sent to the SOLCOM and signed by the official representatives of the 17 affiliate organizations, along with the minutes of the Joint and Expanded National Council and National Executive Committee Meeting that was held on 18 – 19 January 2006 at the School of Labor and Industrial Relations (SOLAIR) in the University of the Philippines.
Copies of the letter and the minutes have also been provided to the group of Ka Vic Fabe which, as of this writing, is yet to submit to the SOLCOM a written position on the matter and the other pertinent issues at hand.
Even in the absence of a written and clear position paper from the group of Ka Vic Fabe, the SOLCOM has decided to push through with the joint consultation workshop. Just to facilitate the activity, the group of Ka Aning Loza and Ka Prot Naga concurred with the SOLCOM proposal to allow “equal number of participants” from both sides regardless of the number of affiliate organizations in each group, on the condition that each participant would present a resolution from the governing bodies of their organizations endorsing them as authorized representatives to ensure authentic and legitimate representation.
The group of Ka Aning Loza and Ka Prot Naga, despite the short notice, religiously complied with this requirement. All the organizations under its wings submitted such resolutions required. This fact can be attested to by the SOLCOM Secretariat.
On the very day of the consultation workshop though, the SOLCOM has relaxed this rule to allow many participants from the group of Ka Vic Fabe (who do not have the required documents) to participate. Some participants belonging to the group of Ka Aning Loza and Ka Prot Naga vehemently protested this, but they relented nonetheless, when Fr. Noel Vasquez, the SOLCOM Chair, apologize and convinced them to just let it pass to enable a greater number of people to participate in the consultation, saying that anyway there will be no voting or elections that would be held that day.
According to reports that came in, during the joint consultation workshop, short of making an open declaration, some individuals identified with the group of Ka Vic Fabe were agitating for the dissolution of PAKISAMA as a corporate entity and are not amenable to a unity congress citing numerous issues. This however needs to be confirmed since the group of Ka Vic Fabe as mentioned earlier, is yet to submit its written position on the matter. For the sake of fairness and transparency, we urge Ka Vic Fabe and his group to come out clean and make their position on the matter clear and unequivocal as soon as possible, so the people, particularly the affiliates and members of PAKISAMA, may know.
In an effort to come up with a concrete recommendation and workshop output, the SOLCOM, accordingly on the motion of one participant in the joint consultation workshop, has requested all the PAKISAMA leaders involved in the partisan conflict to step out of the room to allow those who are not involved in the intramurals to deliberate on the direction of PAKISAMA. Reliable sources revealed that when a straw vote among those who were left inside the room was conducted, 21 participants, including those who come from organizations that the group of Ka Vic Fabe has identified as part of their group, support and favored the conduct of a PAKISAMA Unity Congress. Only 4 participants, all coming from the group of Ka Vic Fabe voted against a unity congress and 2 participants expressed conditional support.
But in a surprising and strange twist, according to reports, the very same person who motioned for the straw vote, a certain Michael from the group of Ka Vic Fabe, after taking a rather long washroom break, belatedly tried to withdraw his motion, but was told instead that the straw voting has been done while he was out and a decisive majority has voted for a unity congress.
Despite the straw vote, no decision was made during the consultation workshop on how to go about with PAKISAMA. Some of the participants though are optimistic that somehow the SOLCOM would consider the result of the straw vote in the crafting of their recommendations to the court. Then too, on a more positive note, the group of Ka Vic Fabe apparently have been overheard to have expressed willingness to abide by whatever decision and recommendation the SOLCOM would make. But then again, it remains to be verified since there was neither an open declaration of such nor a written position from their group.
Everyone is eagerly awaiting the recommendations of the SOLCOM and we look forward to receiving from them an official communication regarding the just concluded joint consultation workshop. As soon as we get word from them, we shall keep you all posted.
We can only hope that in the end reason would prevail and that the concerned leaders would realize that all it will take to resolve with finality the situation in PAKISAMA is a little sacrifice from them.
In this respect, insofar as the group of Ka Aning Loza and Ka Prot Naga is concerned, they had long made a decision and took the position that all those involved in the conflict should step aside and give way to a new set of leaders to take over the reins of a united PAKISAMA. As a matter of fact, this is the spirit behind the Joint Compromise Agreement that was signed in October 2005. We urge Ka Vic Fabe to exercise moral leadership on his group to live up to the terms of the agreement of which he is a signatory for and on behalf of his group by authority of the special power of attorney which they have submitted to the court.
Everybody has the right to express opinions, pro or con, and we respect that. But we do believe that the best that can be done at the moment is to let the PAKISAMA leaders and members sort out for themselves the mess. The least that we can do is to support them in this most difficult time as they embark on the road to re-unification.
The majority has spoken and keeps reiterating their desire to see through a united PAKISAMA, let us support them. If in any event, some people for their own private and personal reasons, could not get along with the majority’s decision to move on with a united PAKISAMA, let us respect them and urge them to just go their own ways without dragging the whole institution with them. Membership and affiliation in PAKISAMA has at all times been voluntary, in the same manner, those who want to leave are always free to go anytime. But for as long as a majority of the affiliates and members remain willing to go on with PAKISAMA, let them be.
Thank you for bearing us.
Samson B. Pedragosa
National Coordinator
Pambansang Kilusan ng mga Samahang Magsasaka (PAKISAMA)
Room 7A, Ground Floor, Bonifacio Hall, School of Labor and Industrial Relations, Emilio Jacinto Street, University of the Philippines, Diliman, 1101 Quezon City, Philippines
Telephone: +632 426 7785
Telefax: +632 426 7784
Email: pakisama@tri-isys.com
Web: www.geocities.com/pakisamaorg/
For news and updates log on to http://padayon.blogspot.com
